2008년 4월 27일 일요일

8th week's summary

**Human-computer interaction**
We learned about "AI is the science of making machines do things that would require intelligence if done by humans." last week.

Then, let's know about outline of this week.
First, key point that has implications for the aesthetic, ethics and evaluation of human-computer interaction. Second, history of HCI from a tools perspective.
Third, the answer of Ethnomethodology. etc.

What is technology? Just computer? NO. It is a kimchi(special 젓갈), chair(made creative),
pot → needs still and technic!

The key point of today is that "People often interact with media technologies as though the technologies were people."
*related points : ethics → very important culture and thinking
*related points : aesthetics & teleology → related ‘critique of judgement’
*related points : design → If we view objects, technologies and natural phenomenon as if they do, in fact, have goals and intentions, then we will design like an artificial intelligence researcher.

And, HCI is a just tool-building perspective.
*history of HCI as tools : systems → computer, monitor, mouse(all kinds of HCI)
*PPT_14 : human engeneering → example : made human engeneering
*funding : military, university, government, companies →
webcam(easy input machine), convenience : trace changes variety

Where does HCI meet AI? Should the computer act like a person? etc. questions....
also, what problem does Weizenbaum's ELIZA system address or solve?
- the artificial intelligence answer: it does (or does not) behave like a human and is therefore successful (or not successful)
- the ethnomethodology answer: it is taken to be a like a person in a conversation and thus simply works like most other technologies in a social situation

What is the ethnomthodology? "Ethnomethodology doffers from other sociological perspectives in one very important respect" : Ethnomethodologists assume that social order is illusory.

This week's lecture is also interesting.

댓글 없음: